But nobody’s going to do that.My years of a Mac user can be broken into three main eras: Or, if you add all of Apple’s extras – external Thunderbolt storage, Apple Care protection, Apple TV, Final Cut Pro X etc etc – a fairly ridiculous £6628.90. On the other hand, we should probably mention that the fully specced-up version will set you back £3520. If you’re going to part with the cash, it might well make sense to go all-in. It’ll be interesting to see how the Retina 5K iMac deals with the rigours of the workplace investing in more RAM (up to 32GB), faster storage (you can get 1TB of PCIe-based solid-state) and the upgraded processor (a 4GHz i7) and graphics (Radeon M295X, capable of delivering 3.5 teraflops) will probably mean getting more from that display. (As an aside, any apps that meet the latest Yosemite specification will support 5K resolutions – so there will be several games available to put the display through its paces.) It’s forgivable, though that 5K resolution is nothing if not demanding, and the detail on screen at the time was hugely impressive. Dragging huge RAW images around on screen was a little jerky, and it was obvious that Tomb Raider has seen silkier renditions – there were clearly dropped frames. The experience wasn’t universally smooth, though. And, frankly, seeing any familiar game at this sort of resolution is special. The only software that posed a challenge was Tomb Raider, which took a few seconds to spring to life, but even that was impressively quick. It tore through OS X Yosemite at speed, opening most apps without a pause. The machine we tried was stock £2000 specification: a 3.5GHz Core i5 processor, 8GB memory, Radeon M290X graphics and a 1TB Fusion drive (a combination SSD / hard disk). We can’t wait to see how it performs under lab conditions. In short, the man telling us this screen was rather good wasn’t fibbing. Indeed, for anyone after a professional photography or videography machine, those extra pixels could make for an invaluable workspace. At a glance it’s almost as if the screen’s a fake, printed directly on the glass.īut, yes, the image moves, and it was equally impressive with the video we saw demonstrated in Final Cut – a full 4K movie of sample footage that played smoothly and, despite being rendered pixel-for-pixel, left space for the toolbars around the screen. Text in menus and documents is burr-free – pure, eggshell smooth, right up until you get to about a hand’s breadth away. Though it was hard to judge properly, in the test conditions colours looked punchy no matter what angle we were viewing it from, and details in images of medieval churches and full-frame Hasselblad-grabbed street scenes were rendered amazingly crisply. It’s a bespoke-designed panel with from-the-ground up electronics, to which glass is fused directly to reduce the barrier between viewer and pixels. It’s 27in across, with a resolution of 5120 x 2880 – those 14.7million pixels yield a resolution of 219ppi, versus the 109ppi of its 1080p-equipped siblings. But even with the bullsh1t detector at work, it’s obvious that the Retina 5K Display is something else. Now, the testing environments at launch events are never great, not least because there’s always a demonstrator bending your ear about how wonderful the gadget you’re inspecting is.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |